In the
ongoing nightmare of Superstorm Sandy that we can’t yet wake up from in our
coastal areas, trees are much on my mind.
I see
the massacre of our area’s trees everywhere around us in the Garden State.
Our
home there near Sandy Hook – the name coincidence is not lost on me either and
just reinforces the lingering Sandy imprimatur – is more or less home base too
for my Duchess Designs fine gardening and landscape design work.
I have
been meaning to write about the tree destruction as a follow up to my last post
but have been consumed with cleaning garden clients’ gardens of Sandy and her
salty spread.
We
have planted spring bulbs too, a sure of hopefulness. That’s another story.
I
Tweeted about the wanton destruction of the trees, especially after talking to
my arborist, Mike Hufnagel, Hufnagel Tree Service (www.hufnageltree.com) who told me of the
preemptive slaughter of too many trees.
I was
stunned.
Mike
also says, “Today’s acorn is tomorrow’s mighty oak. I always tell my customers that Oak is the
most desirable tree to have on your property.
Even if a superstorm can make them uproot and split.”
Quite
philosophically, he continues, “We have to remember we live in an ancient
forest. It is only that we choose to build our dwellings and communities here!
The Trees were here first.”
On
November 27 he wrote to me with no small amount of anger and sadness, “I am
witnessing a massacre of the rest of the untouched storm-damaged large trees
being removed due to Fear!! Everyone is cutting trees due to fear.
Just
look at all the tree companies driven by $$$$.
Instead of educating the community on Tree failure and maintenance.”
Mike
adds, “We are living in the age of Extinction of our mature forest trees!!! So
sad!!”
Indeed.
I
researched cultures that killed their trees – from Haiti to Greenland to
Africa.
It
never ended well for those places and, in fact, the “civilizations” either died
out or changed their climate. Of course
in those situations, trees were ostensibly cut for more or less valid purposes:
building materials and grazing.
Our
wholesale massacres are happening out of fear and ignorance - which is so much more shameful.
On the
other hand, there is the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Wangari Muta Maathai, a
Kenyan who, according to the official site of the Nobel Prize, was awarded the
honor because she “introduced the
idea of planting trees with the people in 1976 and continued to develop it into
a broad-based, grassroots organization whose main focus is the planting of
trees with women groups in order to conserve the environment and improve their
quality of life. However, through the Green Belt Movement she has assisted
women in planting more than 20 million trees on their farms and on schools and church
compounds.”
Tolkien and Trees: Lord of the Rings & The
Hobbit Teach us about the magic of Trees
HobbitTree: photo courtesy neobeatificvision.wordpress.com |
I have had a
long love affair with J.R.R Tolkien’s respect for trees. I have written about how the author imbued
his trees with xx and empowers the trees.
They are the heroes of the stories.
In an
enchanting way, Tolkien inspires us to embrace trees for their life force and
inspiration.
In order to
more accurately describe how Tolkien’s Trees resonate, I researched the web and
discovered Claudia Riiff Finseth’s www.theonering.net
Riiff
captivated me with this intro: “Anyone who has walked in a forest knows there
is no better place for adventure. Snow White knew it, and so did Hansel and
Gretel. Trees and forests, with all their branches and paths, hollows and
hiding places are perfect for suspense, surprise, enchantment and danger.”
“To speak of
J.R.R. Tolkien and trees in one breath is to speak of a life-long love affair.
From the time he was a boy and played among the trees in the countryside at
Sarehole in Warwickshire at the turn of the century until his death at
Bournmouth in 1973, Tolkien was, as Galadriel says of Sam the hobbit, a “lover
of trees.” Humphrey Carpenter in his biography (1977, p.24) says of Tolkien,
“. . .And
though he liked drawing trees, he liked most of all to be with trees.
He would climb
them, lean against them, even talk to them. It saddened him to discover that
not everyone shared his feelings towards them. One incident in particular
remained in his memory: ‘There was a willow hanging over the mill-pool and I
learned to climb it. . .One day they cut it down. They didn’t do anything with
it; the log just lay there. I never forgot that.’”
As a lover of
trees and a man who abhorred the needless destruction of them, Tolkien the
writer often defined his characters as good or evil in part by their feelings
about trees. Many of the evil peoples in his stories are tree-destroyers. The
orcs heedlessly and mindlessly hew away at the living trees of Fangorn; Saruman
destroys the beauty of the Shire by erecting buildings from its trees; and
Sauron’s evil presence turns Greenwood the Great to the black and decaying
boughs of Mirkwood and makes Mordor so sterile that a tree cannot grow there.
Conversely,
among the good peoples of Tolkien’s world are many tree-lovers; one could
almost say it is one of the hallmarks of Tolkien’s good people. Galadriel,
Legolas and the whole host of Elves show a deep regard for trees, almost as
brethren; the Ents and Huorns tend and guard their forests as shepherds protect
their sheep; Samwise, the hobbit-gardener, cherishes the soil of Galadriel’s
garden, using it to restore his own devastated Shire; Aragorn, rightful King of
Gondor, takes as his banner symbol the White Tree; and Niggle desires nothing
more before he dies than to finish his painting of a tree, Tolkien’s metaphor
for one’s life work, for his own writing.
Hobbit Tree Tunnel, photo courtesy of BluePueblo, Tumblr |
Tolkien’s life was
filled from boyhood with the rich symbolism of the great trees of literature.
The stories that “awakened desire” in him as a child included “above all,
forests.”
Trees in Today’s News
The
Tree issue continues to dominate the news and I’m sure will be a topic of this
evening’s MetroHort group meeting and holiday pot luck holiday event.
Today’s
New York Times features a front page
Tree story: “Spate of Harsh Weather in New England Shifts Sentiments on Trees.”
The
report highlights this new, scary approach to trees, writing, “People are looking at trees near their home in a
different manner….It’s no longer, ‘This is a nice shade tree.’ It’s ‘This tree could fall on my house.’”
“People were envisioning having entire trees
crashing down on their houses and there was a lot of panic,” said Phillip
Cambo, president of Northern Tree Service, a tree-removal company that serves
much of New England”
Further,
the story does acknowledge the gift that trees are: Trees add character and beauty to a property, of course, but they also
benefit the environment, trapping carbon dioxide, one of the major contributing
greenhouse gases, and releasing oxygen. And they help protect against erosion
and maintain the balance of the ecosystem.
Several storm-battered towns across New England
have undertaken extensive replanting programs — though many programs encourage
planting smaller trees, like fruit trees and dogwoods, rather than the pines
and maples that, when mature, can cause the most damage.
Many New England towns authorize local tree
wardens to determine the health of shade trees and ban their removal unless
they pose a hazard.” The New York
Times "Once Leafy & Friendly, Now Menacing"
I
argue that we should replant the big trees.
We
need their shade, their vital lung work for us – and for the myriad other
functions they provide to so many of Mother Nature’s denizens.
And we also need another moniker for those who work in towns on behalf of trees. A “Tree Warden” does not sound good or friendly despite its meaning of keeper and custodian. Perhaps it’s the connection to a prison that conjures up a less than kindly protector status.
How
about Tree Keeper or Tree Champion (America loves competition and winners…) Or
how about the good ol’ Tree Hugger?
I got
back to town (Manhattan) after weeks of post Sandy garden clean up and
maintenance only to find the row of trees on Wall Street have been uprooted and
cut down! Deliberate?
More Tree Talk
Below
is a copy of an article written by Tyler Silvestro for the American Society of
Landscape Architect’s Dirt publication.
The article covers a lecture by James Urban. I received the copy as part of my membership
conversation with fellow Landscape Design Alumni Group.
We
enjoy and benefit from professional knowledge, support & tips from
experience, and shared interests.
You Can’t Fool Mother Nature but
You Can Understand Her
04/18/2012
by asla dirt
James
Urban, FASLA, noted soil and tree expert, recently gave his talk, “You Cannot
Fool Mother Nature but You Can Understand Her,” at the Arsenal in New York
City. Urban is a prolific writer and lecturer on the subject of tree planting
and the conditions needed to improve tree
performance in urban environments.
Urban
focused his talk on eight simple ideas, all basic steps to yield more
productive growth in urban trees. The ideas were driven home by a slideshow
containing images from his recent award-winning planting guide and bookshelf
mainstay, “Up By Roots: Healthy Soils and Trees in the Built Environment.”
To
Urban, planting trees is all about the science. Take a walk down your street
and notice the adolescent trees stuffed into the recently curb-cut sidewalk.
According to Urban, that is our fatal mistake. We try all the time [to fool
nature] but we never win.
The
space below the ground is competing with other urban systems: storm water
structures, utilities, urban compaction systems. These obstacles severely
hinder the performance of those adolescent trees, many of which were not even
properly selected in the first place. Urban shared his understanding of this
paradigm: Once we have a hypothesis, we tend to give extra weight to any information
that supports that hypothesis. To Urban, this kind of thinking leads to many
street trees being planted incorrectly.
Over
the past thirty years, Urban has been instrumental in the development of both
structural soils and structural cells for use under sidewalk pavement. However,
his message has remained and his eight guiding principles to planting trees
have as well:
1.
Trees need dirt!
2.
Plant trees that are native to their urban ecosystem.
3. Can
you resolve the conflict between the politics of trees and the planting of
trees?
4.
There is no free lunch.
5. Get
just one tree right.
6.
More soil volume please.
7.
Harvest storm water.
8.
Improve the nursery stock.
1.
Trees need dirt!
According
to Urban, New York is actually a relatively easy place to grow trees. To become
a functional, mature tree in an urban environment, a tree needs between 800 and
1,200 cubic feet of good-quality loam soil. Urban believes that New York City
has the space but not the soil.
2.
Plant trees that are native to their urban ecosystem.
To
further understand this concept the audience was pushed to buy Peter Del
Tredici’s, Wild Urban Plants of the Northeast: A Field Guide. No longer are we
harking back to the Manhattan planting plan for advice on what to plant on
Queens Boulevard. Urban, the consummate pioneer of the urban environment tried
to incite the crowd. Lets get into it and start figuring it out! Urban also
warned us that in ten years or less we will all be calling nurseries to
purchase Ailanthus.
3. Can
you resolve the conflict between the politics of trees and the planting of
trees?
Urban
took this opportunity to speak of the role of the arborist. Currently,
certification is relatively easy to obtain. However, as the profession of
arborist progresses it needs serious restrictions. Making certification more
difficult to acquire would promote the profession, putting them on the
political map. Arborists could then better join broader political discussions
and highlight the importance of trees.
4.
There is no free lunch.
Here
Urban stressed the idea of compost. His example that two tons of raw wood only
produces one ton of compost is telling in that he believes there is room to
explore this area. He further explains this idea by bashing the hot item right
now, Bio-Char. After describing Bio-Char as really bad, he lightened the
assault by clarifying that it is only good for small amounts of soil. I wonder
if this simple idea was an idea at all, or an excuse to diminish the popularity
of the charcoal-based soil amendment.
5. Get
just one tree right.
In a
checklist for tree design, one requirement is to understand the root area index
(RAI), the calculation determining the correlation between the root and the
surface area. To explain this, Urban used an image of a wine glass standing on
a dinner plate. The dinner plate, representing the soil volume and the wine
glass base, the trunk flare, are basic visuals of how simple a successful
planting can be.
6. More soil please.
Again
Urban stressed the importance of understanding soils and the surroundings. Soil
can be understood as the community of vegetated and urban systems surrounding
the planting site. Urban explained the efficiency of his structural cells
compared to that of constructed soils (Cu soils). One attendee, an expert and
supplier of Cu soils, vehemently disagreed. He argued that the structural rock
matrix that makes up the load bearing component of Cu soils do not inversely
affect the performance of tree roots as Urban suggested. Not wanting to get
into a fight over the success of his inventions, Urban explained, “I’m almost
done with the Cu slide - actually, I’ve been done with the Cu slide since
2003.”
7.
Harvest storm water.
When
designing systems its important to allow nature to guide us in protecting our
natural systems from floatables, hydrocarbons, chemical pollutants, and runoff
toxins. In the green infrastructure overhaul of New York City, large trees will
play an important role in the solution and have the ability to store and
process massive amounts of storm water both in their roots and leaves.
8.
Improve nursery stock.
Nursery
stock, in the age of the New York City’s Million Trees Project, has become a
hot topic. Tree growth can be determined before a tree is even planted if a
basic understanding of the stock is obtained. There are many issues concerning
healthy plant growth at nurseries. Proper limbing, pruning, watering, drainage,
sunlight, soil volume, and basic organization are all things to consider when
visiting a nursery for healthy plants. However, the number one issue is
container plants. We need to stop buying container trees. It’s an unfixable
problem! The girdling of roots has no remedy and their trees have no chance of
reaching their potential.
Much
of what James Urban discussed in his lecture seems to touch on the ideas of
publicity. Yes, the science of tree planting is essential to success but so are
politics. Urban reiterated this idea by empowering key figures in the crowd.
The Parks Department, the City of New York, and New York Restoration Project
need to put pressure on nurseries! Its Urban's hope that New York City will
become the benchmark for intelligent street tree planting.
This
guest post is by Tyler Silvestro, a master’s degree candidate at the City
College of New York (CUNY), and writer for The Architects Newspaper.
I especially appreciate the advice for trees' role in storm water harvest.
Our
communities – urban or suburban demand we care for our trees.
Please
do not allow ignorance or fear to allow large-scale murder and massacre of our
trees.
Their
removal is our loss. The repercussions are
long term and far reaching.
There
is no “do-over.”
Central Park, NYC Tree Art Two Days before Sandy Storm |
I saw this news clip and thought it was topical and timely - so I'm adding a footnote to the save our trees story because it touts the benefits of trees. Titled "Tree Power," the news item is a Q&A. The answer essentially provides a metric to the query of how many pounds of carbon dioxide does a 40-acre farm absorb in a year. And how many pounds of oxygen are emitted. The value for a 50-year old oak forest (see oak recommendation above in story) would be 30,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per acre. And the forest would emit about 22,000 pounds of oxygen. By comparison, an average car emits more than 11,000 pounds of carbon dioxide so a single acre of woodlot would be countering the emissions of about 15 cars from that 40 acres of trees. Do we need more proof we really, really need our trees? Oh yes. They are beautiful too. and you can put swings in them...
ReplyDelete